"Justice Clarence Thomas likens all the outside political pressure that the Supreme Court is facing over its review of the Obama administration’s sweeping health care law
to the distraction faced by a free-throw shooter confronted with fans
waving wildly behind the basket. Neither, in his view, has much impact
in the end," starts the New York Times post. "The groups filing amicus briefs include not only the usual heavy hitters
like the chamber, AARP and virtually every major health care
association, but also obscure groups that have rarely, if ever, been
involved in a Supreme Court case...Dozens of other constituencies filing briefs put in similar efforts....Economists are wading into the debate with briefs that offer clashing
views of the benefits and harms that they believe the health care law
brings....And the State of Massachusetts, which approved a similar insurance model
under Gov. Mitt Romney in 2006, argues in its amicus brief that its
experience 'confirms that Congress had a rational basis' to impose
minimum insurance requirements." Read more. .
No comments:
Post a Comment