Thursday, August 11, 2016
Renewed Warnings about Workplace Eye Injuries
Friday, February 19, 2016
Porn Actors Happy without Eyewear
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Porn Stars Protest Eyewear Regulations
Sunday, September 6, 2015
New Protective Eyewear from Honeywell
Monday, July 21, 2014
Call for Higher Standard for Pediacric Protective Eyewear
Wednesday, July 2, 2014
Protective Eyewear Maybe Not Adequate for U.S. Soldiers
Saturday, November 9, 2013
Protective Eyewear Required When Filming Porn in California
Friday, October 11, 2013
New Safety Eyewear from Honeywell
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Jason Maxielwearl to Don Protective Eye
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Protective Eyewear from Kimberly-Clark
“Protective eyewear: When protection against the sun is important, Kimberly-Clark Professional introduces new and improved Jackson Safety Nemesis Polarized Safety Eyewear,” according to Utility Products. “The safety glasses offer extended protection in a polarized lens, reducing eye fatigue as well as providing superior peripheral vision and side protection through a sleek, wraparound design. A specialty lens minimizes the oriented light that causes glare, allowing the wearer to see fine details and deep colors without eyestrain, eye stress or fatigue. It does so without compromising or sacrificing clarity, performance or durability. The glasses are comfortable enough for all-day use.” Read more.
Monday, April 29, 2013
ASTM Developing Eye Protection Standard for Airsoft Sports
“In response to requests from both insurance providers and playing facility operators, ASTM International Committee F08 on Sports Equipment and Facilities is developing ASTM WK27246, Specification for Eye Protective Devices for Airsoft Sports,” reports Yahoo News. “Proposed standard will provide eyewear test procedures that are specifically designed for airsoft.” Read more.
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
New from Liberty Sport’s Protective Frame Series
“F8 Street Series, the top selling collectible F803 sports protective frames series will be introducing two new designs to the collection,” says Midwest Lens. “The collection was launched in 2010 with six authentic designs inspired by a fusion of sports performance and street art. Since that time, four new additional designs have been integrated into the assortment, rounding out the total to ten available skus. This year Liberty Sport will launch two new designs that are a little more on trend, edgy, and targeted more to teens.” Read more.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
More on the Protective Eyewear Study
A new study conducted by researchers at Hasbro Children's Hospital, the Center for Injury Research and Policy of The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Fairfax (VA) County Public Schools, and Boston Children's Hospital has found that high school field hockey players competing in states with mandated protective eyewear have significantly lower rates of head, eye, and facial injuries when compared to players who compete in states without protective eyewear mandates.
Each academic year, an estimated 63,000 girls participate in high school-sanctioned field hockey in the United States. Head, facial, and eye injuries are common among field hockey players, and, occasionally, are catastrophic. In recent years, there has been ongoing debate among coaches, players, parents, rules committees, and medical professionals regarding the efficacy of protective eyewear in preventing these injuries.
The study, currently online and appearing in the December 2012 print issue of Pediatrics, examined injuries among high school field hockey players 14-18 years of age during the 2009-10 and 2010-11 scholastic seasons, just prior to the national mandate by the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) requiring the use of protective eyewear for all high school field hockey players which went into effect during the 2011-12 season.
Researchers found that the rates of all head and face injuries (including eye injuries and concussion) were significantly higher in states with no protective eyewear mandate compared to states with protective eyewear mandates. Players from states with no protective eyewear mandate were more than five times more likely to sustain an eye injury than players from states with mandated protective eyewear. In addition, a larger percentage of injuries sustained by athletes from states with no protective eyewear mandate required more than 10 days to return to activity (32 percent) compared to athletes from states with mandated protective eyewear (17 percent).
Read more.